This collection of info was sent to all UK train operating companies, and one or two related addresses, thus. Feel free to send it to your own transport operator, if they are trying to enforce or even recommend mask usage. Don’t forget to put in your own name and address!
firstname.lastname@example.org;email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; customers@LNER.co.uk; assisted.travel@LNER.co.uk; group.travel@LNER.co.uk; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com
I am writing to you to provide information about masks, of which you may not be aware. Please forward this message to senior staff/management for review.
The government and media have been lying about Coronavirus from Day One – and research quickly reveals this. They are also not giving all the important facts about generalised use of masks. This could result in people – particularly the elderly – experiencing unnecessary health effects – which, in some cases, could be fatal. Suitably informed individuals could take legal action against your company, if they were so inclined. In Orange County, USA, mandatory mask declarations were withdrawn when this was pointed out to the relevant authorities (details below). You have a duty of care to study all the information below, before someone dies or falls ill because of the unnecessary risk your policy creates.
I am not expecting you to listen to me, but personally, this does not matter, as I will not be using your service whilst such a ridiculous policy is being implemented by yourselves. I am also boycotting any and all non-essential businesses which are using any COVID-19 measures as they are, without exception unjustified and unjustifiable. (Please read my independent report, at the first web site link below).
Note: If you think masks should be worn “to reduce risk to others” then why are you even running a Bus service? One of your buses could crash and kill people – despite measures taken to prevent this. Why even leave the house? For example, in going down some stairs, there is a risk you will trip and injure yourself, or someone else you “crash into” on the way down. You should therefore avoid all stairs, right? The exact same logic is at work in the all-pervasive propaganda in the media in relation to the alleged risk from SARS2-COV (which has never been isolated by the way).
From the Mouths of UK Govt or Their Advisors
A 40-second video, https://www.bitchute.com/video/0BxtCsyyQgDt/. Transcript below.
Matt Hancock – 24 April 2020 – Online Interview
“The evidence for the use of masks by the general public – especially outdoors – is extremely weak…”
Government Briefing Statement on 24 April 2020
The evidence on facemasks has always been quite variable… quite weak, quite difficult to know and there’s no real trials on it.
Chris Whitty – 4 March
In terms of wearing a mask, if you don’t have an infection really reduces the risks… almost not at all…
28 April 2020 – Government Briefing
The recommendation from SAGE is completely clear – which is that there is weak evidence of a small effect in which a face mask can prevent a source of infection going from someone who is infected to the people around them.
Chris Whitty on 11/5/2020
“The great majority of the population won’t die from this. A proportion of the population won’t get the virus at all. Of those who get symptoms – 80% mild or moderate. Even the very highest risk groups – the great majority if they catch this virus will not die”.
Chris Whitty (Chief Medical Adviser to the UK Government)
Links about the Ineffectiveness of Masks for COVID-19
WHO’s statement from March 2020:
There is also the attached leaflet that someone (not me) made. Here is the text from it:
University of Edinburgh:
“Conversely, surgical and hand-made masks, and face shields, generate significant leakage jets that have the potential to disperse virus-laden fluid particles by several metres. The different nature of the masks and shields makes the direction of these jets difficult to be predicted, but the directionality of these jets should be a main design consideration for these covers. They all showed an intense backward jet for heavy breathing and coughing conditions. It is important to be aware of this jet, to avoid a false sense of security that may arise when standing to the side of, or behind, a person wearing a surgical, or handmade mask, or shield.”
(JAMA) Journal of the American Medical Association:
“Face masks should not be worn by healthy individuals to protect themselves from acquiring respiratory infection because there is no evidence to suggest that face masks worn by healthy individuals are effective in preventing people from becoming ill.” https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2762694
(BMJ) British Medical Journal: “..laboratory-confirmed virus were significantly higher in the cloth masks group.. Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97%.. This study is the first RCT of cloth masks, and the results caution against the use of cloth masks.. Moisture retention, reuse of cloth masks and poor filtration may result in increased risk of infection.” PMID: 25903751
(NEJM) New England Journal of Medicine: “We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection.” PMID: 32237672
American Journal of Infection Control: “Face mask use in health care workers has not been demonstrated to provide benefit in terms of cold symptoms or getting colds.” PMID: 19216002
Journal of Influenza & Other Respiratory Viruses: “None of the studies established a conclusive relationship between mask/respirator use and protection against influenza infection.” PMID: 22188875
Journal of Epidemiology & Infection: “There is little evidence to support the effectiveness of face masks to reduce the risk of infection.” PMID: 20092668
Journal Neurocirugia (Neurosurgery): “Preliminary Report on Surgical Mask Induced Deoxygenation During Major Surgery.. Our study revealed a decrease in the oxygen saturation of arterial pulsations (SpO2)” PMID: 18500410
Journal Headache: “Most healthcare workers develop de novo PPE (such as N95 face mask) associated headaches or exacerbation of their pre-existing headache disorders.” PMID: 32232837
Journal of Life and Environmental Sciences: “This study showed that the filtering efficiency of cloth face masks were relatively lower, and washing and drying practices deteriorated the efficiency.” PMID: 31289698
Annals of Internal Medicine: “..both surgical and cotton masks seem to be ineffective in preventing the dissemination of SARS–CoV-2 from the coughs of patients with COVID-19 to the environment and external mask surface.” https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-1342
Respiratory acidosis: “Respiratory acidosis develops when air inhaled into and exhaled from the lungs does not get adequately exchanged between the carbon dioxide from the body and oxygen from the air.” https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/313110
Wearing a Mask Can Reduce Your Blood Oxygen Level to a Dangerous Level – From US Attorney, Leigh Dundas
Thanks to Kathy for this info.
From US Attorney, Leigh Dundas
First, a disclaimer: this email does not constitute legal or medical advice, nor the formation of an attorney-client relationship. Please feel free to make use of this information, as needed, in your own lives.
Letter sent to the Supervisors of Orange County, California:
NOTICE: 6/9/20 Mask-Wearing Caused DANGEROUS Drops in Oxygen Levels in OC Residents
I wish to thank you again for taking the time yesterday to focus on the mandatory mask order. As I was inside the building when the OC residents decided to begin donning masks on the County Hall steps, it was not until this morning that I was presented with the data.
At the request of certain educators in OC, I summarized the data in an email. I am forwarding that email (below) for your review as well. Given this information, I am hereby requesting an immediate response by OC Health Department to the effect that mask wearing – which causes such precipitous drops in oxygenation – is healthy. Frankly, I doubt that such a statement can or will be forthcoming, given that every medical study worldwide holds that catastrophic medical situations and death occur in these low oxygen ranges.
If no statement can be propounded by OC Health Department – that it is medically safe for one to have oxygenation levels below 92% – then I would expect an immediate retraction of the Department’s order IN FULL regarding mask wearing. Even “recommending” such an action – now that we are all on notice that mask wearing for even a few minutes creates immediate and dangerous hypoxemia – puts OC residents at risk of catastrophic organ failure and death, with untold liability facing the Board and its agencies for same.
Leigh Dundas, Esq.
Leigh’s email to the Orange County Board of Supervisors on the same day:
Provided below is a brief list of new studies from recent days — but at the outset of this email I want to take a brief detour to summarize the results of what happened to OC residents wearing masks yesterday. This is a MUST READ BEFORE ANY EDUCATOR EVEN BEGINS TO CONSIDER MANDATORY MASKING OF STUDENTS OR TEACHERS.
On Tuesday, June 9, 2020, OC residents turned out en masse to the Board of Supervisors meeting to protest the mandatory mask order. At the meeting the health officer provided zero medical-scientific data that mandatory mask-wearing was safe, particularly during summertime high temperatures, or in the context of young children – nor could he provide any study showing mask-wearing is effective at containing viral transmission in order to combat the myriad studies showing it is NOT effective at viral containment.
At the meeting numerous doctors, attorneys, educators, psychologists, parents, and concerned residents cited medical studies on the harms from mask-wearing. So upset were these residents by the failure of the health officer to rescind the medically-unsubstantiated mandatory mask order – which intransigent position also drew hours of heavy fire from the Supervisors – or even to provide any studies showing efficacy of mask-wearing, that the residents proceeded to go outside onto the steps of the County Hall, at noon, in the 100 degree heat, and put on the “mandated masks” while using a Pulse Oximeter to measure their oxygen levels and heart rate.
The results were nothing short of horrifying:
ALL of the individuals had their oxygen rate drop from a healthy 98 or 99% (without the mask) – a total of five, ten, and sometimes twenty full points – within a few minutes of mask-wearing. Medically, below 92% is considered “dangerous” – while below 90% oxygen merits a denomination of “hypoxemic” The AVERAGE drop of these OC residents in oxygenation was more than 12 points, into the hypoxemic range.
Two of the participants, one a very fit daily runner, and one a very fit nurse, had their oxygen rates drop into the 70s – where organ damage, systems failure, and death can occur. ALL participants suffered dangerous drops in oxygen: 43% fell into the “dangerous” zone, 29% in the hypoxemic zone, and 29% fell into the extremely dangerous hypoxemic zone (where cardiac arrest, organ failure and death occur.) Even those who just stood around in the masks doing absolutely nothing had frightening drops in oxygen levels. As context, most of the participants were in decently good health, and not overweight. I’m sure I don’t need to extrapolate for the reader what could happen if this test were performed with an average cross section of citizens, i.e., with the nearly 40% of OC residents who suffer from at least one chronic health condition, and with the more than 20% of OC residents who are obese. It is a striking juxtaposition to note that Medicare and most insurance companies will pay for people with oxygen rates of less than 88% to get supplemental oxygen and all carriers and health experts advise you to seek immediate medical intervention below 88% – and the average oxygen rate was two points less than that at 86% after only a few minutes of mask-wearing.
Given the data from yesterday, let me underscore once more in no uncertain terms, and in language that is absolutely unmistakable: the liability that an OC School District or Board will be facing if it mandates mask-wearing for students or teachers is truly incalculable, in the event the mask-wearing causes a drop in oxygen (which we now know it likely will), which then leads to a medical complication or death. We have no idea what will happen to children who are made to wear masks in the triple digit weather of mid-August, but my guess is that their systems, being less developed and often more sensitive — compounded by the fact that children are notoriously poor at self-regulation and are traditionally MUCH more active than adults — will fare very badly indeed. Recent headlines have made quite clear that death of children and losses of consciousness can and do occur: https://nypost.com/2020/05/06/two-boys-drop-dead-in-china-while-wearing-masks-during-gym-class/ and https://7news.com.au/lifestyle/health-wellbeing/two-schoolboys-collapse-and-die-just-six-days-apart-in-china-while-wearing-face-masks-c-1017871 and https://nypost.com/2020/04/24/driver-crashes-car-after-passing-out-from-wearing-n95-mask/.
Let me now turn to the original reason for writing this email, which was to provide you a Summary of Medical Data (June 2020) from Switzerland, which further throws into serious question why educational agencies would make any changes to school protocols – if we are not similarly prepared to make massive overhauls based on the flu season each year (which seasonal flu actually affects children more than COVID does):
• “According to the latest immunological and serological studies, the overall lethality of Covid-19 (IFR) is at most 0.1% and thus in the range of a strong seasonal influenza (flu).”
• “Even in the global “hotspots”, the risk of death for the general population of school and working age is typically in the range of a daily car ride to work.”
• “The median or average age of the deceased in most countries (including Italy) is over 80 years and only about 4% of the deceased had no serious preconditions. The age and risk profile of deaths thus essentially corresponds to normal mortality.” https://swprs.org/a-swiss-doctor-on-covid-19/?fbclid=IwAR1HebavrIpzi2bkq7Djm86JOyh5hTeIRw8QbjhPaSkI_eUOzpUItrWKtj8
Also, New England Journal of Medicine notes that masking is ineffective in community settings, and that even in healthcare arenas, its highest and best use is not to reduce viral transmission but people’s anxiety:
• “The chance of catching Covid-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is minimal. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a REFLEXIVE REACTION TO ANXIETY over the pandemic…. Expanded masking protocols’ greatest contribution may be to reduce the transmission of anxiety, over and above whatever role they may play in reducing transmission of Covid-19.”
New England Journal of Medicine (May, 21, 2020).
Finally, the World Health Organization came out yesterday (June 8, 2020), concluding in NO UNCERTAIN TERMS that asymptomatic patients are NOT spreaders of the virus, which simply confirmed what earlier studies in May had found. Accordingly, we should NOT be worried that Little Johnny is going to catch the virus and bring Covid home to kill Grandma. Put simply: masking and social distancing are unnecessary, will create more medical and psychological damage than benefit, and are unneeded as healthy people and asymptomatic positive people DO NOT SPREAD THE VIRUS (so just keep the sneezy-coughers out of class — which is standard — and we will be just fine):
• “Coronavirus patients without symptoms aren’t driving the spread of the virus, World Health Organization officials said Monday, casting doubt on concerns by some researchers that the disease could be difficult to contain due to asymptomatic infections. ‘We have a number of reports from countries who are doing very detailed contact tracing,’ she said. ‘They’re following asymptomatic cases. They’re following contacts. And they’re not finding secondary transmission onward. It’s very rare.'” https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/08/asymptomatic-coronavirus-patients-arent-spreading-new-infections-who-says.html
Leigh Dundas, Esq.
The masks study video: https://youtu.be/WqhwwLbNZqo
Except for healthcare providers and when in high-risk venues, no one should be wearing a mask.
Most masks are quite unhealthy and some are even disease-promoting—Here’s why!
Those who are manifesting COVID-19 symptoms have a greater need for fresh clean air. Because of the various respiratory illnesses associated with they require prana-filled air more than anything. So do folks who want to prevent catching the coronavirus.
However, when wearing a synthetic mask the person is filtering their air through a synthetic material that outgases the petrochemically derived constituents that most are made of. The masked individual is then breathing in those aerosolized toxic chemicals.
Many of the sickest COVID patients already have various respiratory illnesses and/or chemical sensitivities, so putting a mask on them is the worst thing that can be done. The same applies to people who are relatively healthy but have E.I. syndrome or MCS.*
*E.I. Syndrome = Environmental Illness Syndrome & MCS = Multiple Chemical Sensitivity
Brand new products just taken out of a box are notorious for outgassing various chemical toxins. In the case of a new mask, which is placed right over the mouth and nose, these airborne chemicals go right into both airways.
Therefore, patients stricken with the novel coronavirus ought to be spared from such a misguided practice. A chemical overwhelm can even trigger a respiratory condition that compels the attending physician to put the patient on a ventilator which ought to be strictly avoided for COVID-19 patients.
Venting COVID-19 patients has proven to be injurious to the lungs and often deadly, as several doctors and nurses have testified. Five medical school professors in Italy have also correctly pointed out the extreme risks of ventilators in this scientific research paper:
Oxygen & Carbon Dioxide
With each and every in-breath, the sick individual is also intaking some of the carbon dioxide they just exhaled.
Instead of breathing in fresh clean air full of oxygen, the mask is diminishing their oxygen intake and replacing it with the respiratory waste product—carbon dioxide.
By subtly decreasing their oxygen levels in this manner they are being deprived of the most powerful healing agent for respiratory diseases— (O).
Furthermore, even a slight increase of the carbon dioxide levels in their bloodstream can contribute to anxiety and feelings of nervousness as well as cause headaches, dizziness and fatigue.
For these reasons especially, both the healthy and the ill should avoid wearing a mask like the plague … … … otherwise you may end up getting this coronavirus plague.
Unhygienic and Unsanitary
Even after wearing a mask for a short period of time it becomes filthy. The more polluted the indoor and/or outdoor ambient air is, the quicker the mask will become contaminated.
Not only is the mask capturing particulate and chemical pollution from the ambient air, the accumulation of these throughout the course of a day further obstructs the necessary breathing process.
Hence, the longer a mask is worn in a polluted environment, the dirtier and more contaminated it will become. Just take a close look at the return air filter in your home or garage if you want to see what’s happening with a well-worn mask; albeit, on a much smaller scale.
Now let’s add into the mix the constant coughing and sneezing and spitting up phlegm and mucus. What will inevitably develop regarding the mask is a worst-case scenario that can push the patient onto a ventilator. This is only one reason so many hospital inpatients are being vented; the inappropriate treatment plans also include specific pharmaceutical drugs that are strongly contraindicated for .
Damage the Immune System
Stress can lower Your immunity. A face-covering or mask that interferes with respiration can add to stress. Cortisol is a hormone closely linked with stress. It works as a key player in the body’s stress response and is often measured in research as an indicator of stress.
Cortisol plays a vital role in the body’s functioning; it’s secreted by the kidney’s adrenal glands. But high and sustained blood levels of cortisone in individuals stressed by the fear of COVID-19 can trigger serious and emergent health issues.
*Suppressed thyroid function
*Blood sugar imbalances such as hyperglycemia
*Decreased bone density
*Decrease in muscle tissue
* and inflammatory responses in the body, slowed wound healing, and other health consequences
*Increased abdominal fat, which is associated with a greater amount of health problems than fat deposited in other areas of the body. Some of the health problems associated with increased stomach fat are , developing metabolic syndrome, higher levels of “bad” cholesterol (LDL) and lower levels of “good” cholesterol (HDL), which can lead to other health problems.
Uncomfortable and Depressing
Anyone who has ever worn a tight, scratchy, synthetic mask knows they are so uncomfortable they want to take it off as soon as they put it on. And, that the longer they feel compelled to wear the mask, the more depressing the whole experience becomes.
Not only is this discomfiting experience physically depressing for all the reasons explained above, it can also become emotionally distressing.
There is a LOT of anecdotal evidence that proves the longer the mask is worn throughout the day, the more dispiriting. Likewise, the more days or weeks of continuous mask-wearing, the more distressful life becomes.
The best example of this new fact of life can be found in the many stores where the employees have been forced to wear a mask during the entire work day. Clearly, they are not happy. Nor are they as helpful as they used to be. The usual courtesy and cheerfulness have been replaced with gloom and/or sadness and/or frustration.
Inflammatory Wedge Issue
Whoever put out the official advice of wearing a mask in the manner which has been adopted nationwide has performed a tremendous disservice. Common sense tells everyone that when your immune response can be so compromised by constant mask-wearing, a case of becomes much more likely.
The medical authorities and health officials in charge of the coronavirus response effort need to draft a new national policy post haste before more damage is done to the individual and collective health of the American people.
After many decades of managing all sorts of similar epidemics and pandemics, there is no good reason why such an improper recommendation was ever issued. Many of those epidemics involved similar respiratory diseases, so what makes COVID-19 so different except the nonstop fear-mongering.
Those responsible for this extremely bad mask advice have created — wittingly or unwittingly — a toxic coronavirus culture whereby the mask wearers are looking at those who abstain as being dangerous nonconformists who are somehow threatening the mask-wearer’s health.
In this way, mask-wearing is quickly becoming a divisive wedge issue that has been driven deeply into the heart of the body politic. This certainly does not help the healing process which many are in dire need of today and beyond.
Families and friends are not only being unnecessarily separated during critical periods of the COVID-19 disease process, social tensions are intensifying even more during this extremely tempestuous election year. This state of affairs only creates a more conducive environment for coronavirus clusters to mushroom; after all, stress weakens the immune system (unless it’s well managed).
The flurry of recommendations that were issued by government officials and medical authorities everywhere were fundamentally fear-driven and not based on science or reality. This fear-based guidance has served to stampede countless people into the pen of blind compliance. Not only are many unaware victims of this extremely bad advice never leaving home without a mask on, some of them are closely monitoring every individual in their viewing space without a mask. Others are so bold as to police the erroneous policy as vigilantes do catching lawbreakers. For these and other reasons, the mainstream media and governments across the country are obligated to clarify mask guidance with all deliberate speed.
Yes, healthcare workers ought to wear in every setting that requires one. By the way, .
Likewise, housebound COVID-19 caregivers should also wear a healthy, non-toxic mask when working with a sick family member, friend or loved one, but only when necessary. It’s important to immediately take the mask off whenever it’s not needed.
Obviously, every situation is different and demands its own proper response. For example, a crowded New York City subway needs to be addressed differently than taking a walk down a quiet suburban street. Hence, city dwellers have their own decisions to make whenever they’re walking through a high-traffic area or crowded space.
On the other hand, folks living in rural America can basically go mask free. The same goes for most suburbanites. As for the park or the beach, this is when everyone ought to freely bask in the therapeutic sunlight and open-air environment.
The here is for everyone to use their common sense. The guidance provided in this coronavirus coaching session can be used to inform any decision to wear or not to wear a mask. But perhaps the most important instruction is that .
Everyone, please stay safe and pray for protection.
: The Summer months are an especially dangerous time for folks to wear a mask. In point of fact, several governments around the world have issued official warnings about how wearing a mask can contribute considerably to the development of heat exhaustion and/or heat stroke. Particularly in warmer climes such as the American Deep South and Southwest, people need to be extremely careful about needlessly wearing a mask. For children, masks can be downright fatal. Similarly, the elderly ought to be wary about being bullied into mask-wearing, specifically those with chronic or acute respiratory ailments. Those individuals with certain underlying conditions, notably the older and infirm, can be much more vulnerable to heat exhaustion during the hot season. See:
If You Get Headaches While Wearing A Mask… Now You Know- MIRRORED
It may be because you’re not getting enough oxygen…
Where are some of the Masks Made?
It may shock you…