Letter to Derbs Primary Health Care Trust – Copied to CQC

Feel free to resuse this letter, but remember to change it because I refer to earlier letters I wrote in 2009. Thanks

22 Mear Drive



DE72 3QW

Tel: 01332 544947

01 Aug 2020

Please forward to all directors for considered and cogent response. This will also be sent by “Signed For” post. Thanks.


Dear Directors,


In April and May this year, I wrote to Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust “Patient Experience” regarding the current situation. I also wrote to Public Health England, County Councillors and several other parties, around the same time. My goals in writing to you are:


  • I now have some questions that I would like to be answered.
  • I am making you aware of extremely important evidence, that is being ignored by most or all health agencies and this could be classed, as I understand things, as an act of criminal negligence.


  1. What criteria are being used to shape plans in the county for the use of face coverings? Do these criteria differ in any way to those given by central government?
  2. What would trigger a “local lockdown” exactly please? Who has authority over such a measure? County or Central Govt.?
  3. If there are fewer or no “new cases” of COVID-19 locally, would you put out notices to relax measures, or is it all controlled by Central Govt?
  4. What knowledge is there and what plans have been made available at county level for:
  1. Use and limitations of Track and Trace methods
  2. Mandatory or Other Vaccinations for COVID-19/SARS-COV2
  1. Can you reassure me that if there is an “enhanced” voluntary flu vaccination programme in the autumn/winter months, this will not result in an increase in “positive” COVID tests – due, perhaps, to the presence of RNA in said flu vaccine? Have you looked into this area? For example, I can predict a scenario where people being tested for COVID test positive after being vaccinated – resulting in a “local lockdown”.
  2. In general, what science and scientific studies is/are guiding local policy setting around the COVID19 issue?


Now please study carefully what I have written below.


The Past

Back in 2009, I also wrote to the Dept. of Health and Derbs. Health Authority, as they were then, regarding the Swine Flu “threat.” I pointed out the false information to them in the leaflet that was circulated to all UK households. I asked them a list of questions regarding the matter. You can read that correspondence at this link. In summary, I called out the “Swine Flu” affair as a scam – and the DoH admitted to me that deals to obtain vaccines had been signed in 2007. History now records that I, and the people who sent me information – were correct as the figures on the ONS site clearly show. (Negative figures show when 2009 deaths were fewer than in 2008 or 2010.)

























































’09 – ’08














’09 – ’10














Neither the yearly nor monthly figure comparisons shown above seem consistent with claims of a Swine Flu pandemic having been in progress during 2009 as fewer people actually died in 2009 than in 2008 and 2010! (You could even argue that it was an “unpandemic!” According to an article in the Daily Telegraph from 01 July 2010, “Swine flu killed 457 people and cost £1.24 billion, official figures show.”


With this established as fact, I hope you will now read and study carefully what I have included below – and check it yourselves for accuracy. I am confident you will find no significant errors – and the implications of there being no errors should, in a sane world, trigger you into action. Sadly, my experience over the last 15 years is that we don’t live in a sane world anymore – we live in a world which is controlled, mostly, by insane people.


The Recent Past

You are now being made aware of a “Pandemic tabletop exercise hosted by The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation on October 18, 2019, in New York, NY.” This related to “Coronavirus.” In the introduction of the video “highlights” of the event, posted on Nov 4, 2019 we can hear the following words:

It began in healthy looking pigs, months perhaps years ago – a new Coronavirus, spread silently within herds. Gradually, farmers started getting sick. Infected people got a respiratory illness with symptoms ranging from mild flu-like signs to severe pneumonia. The sickest  required intensive care, many died.  Experts agree unless it is quickly controlled, it could lead to a severe pandemic – an outbreak that circles the globe and affects people everywhere.

On their website, we can read:

About the Event 201 exercise

Event 201 was a 3.5-hour pandemic tabletop exercise that simulated a series of dramatic, scenario-based facilitated discussions, confronting difficult, true-to-life dilemmas associated with response to a hypothetical, but scientifically plausible, pandemic. 15 global business, government, and public health leaders were players in the simulation exercise that highlighted unresolved real-world policy and economic issues that could be solved with sufficient political will, financial investment, and attention now and in the future.

The exercise consisted of pre-recorded news broadcasts, live “staff” briefings, and moderated discussions on specific topics. These issues were carefully designed in a compelling narrative that educated the participants and the audience.

About 6 weeks later, in early December 2019, the first COVID-19 case was allegedly diagnosed in the polluted city of Wuhan, China. Drawing an analogy, if a video of a group planning a bank robbery was discovered after a robbery had taken place – and the group had not been identified at the time of the robbery – and the circumstances in the video had more than a few similarities to the circumstances of the robbery, should the video of the robbery be ignored as “just a coincidence?”


GPMB – Global Preparedness Monitoring Board – Sept 2019

You are now also being made aware of a document produced by the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board – you should be aware of this organisation. The cover of their September 2019 report is interesting, isn’t it? I invite you to study page 5, the contents page – where it lists a section called:



This section starts on page 26.


World Economic Forum (WEF) – 11 March 2020

You are now also being made aware of a 1.25-minute long video posted on WEF’s Youtube channel on 11 Mar 2020. It seems they had this – quite sophisticated video ready to go on the day the WHO director Tedros Adanhom (who does not have a medical degree) declared a “pandemic”. Also of note is that WEF initially openly stated its links to WHO



However, the WEF/WHO statement was removed sometime later https://www.weforum.org/covid-action-platform:


I recommend a quick perusal of their  “COVID-19 related projects” list: https://www.weforum.org/covid-action-platform/projects.


Independent Report by Myself – Andrew Johnson

By April 16th 2020, I had compiled an independent investigative report, setting out facts which mainstream sources were not discussing (including, for example, the actual death figures from 2009, as shown above). As happened in 2009, I had become aware of much information and had quite a number of people contacting me about the COVID19 issue. Please read the entire report and check the 130+ references (where the information hasn’t been deleted or censored, that is). Some of the main conclusions I drew are:


  • The COVID-19 test is not reliable.
  • The SARS-COV2 virus is no more infectious or dangerous than other similar viruses.
  • Pandemic projections about the number of deaths were wrong.
  • Pandemic modelling software is flawed and unreliable.
  • Death figures for COVID-19 have been exaggerated – death causes have been falsely attributed to COVID-19.
  • Excess mortality rates for COVID-19 are low – or even non-existent.
  • Government/WHO advice is irrelevant, contradictory and in any case is not being consistently applied or adhered to by the authorities and leaders themselves.


This report has been read by hundreds of people and I haven’t received any significant corrections. I am now inviting corrections from you.


Face Coverings/Masks

Since posting the last updated version of the report, the UK Government has further breached basic human rights by stating face coverings are “mandatory” in a number of places. However, this contradicts previous recommendations/advice by them:

Matt Hancock – 24 April 2020 – Online Interview – “The evidence for the use of masks by the general public – especially outdoors – is extremely weak…”

Government Briefing Statement on 24 April 2020 – “The evidence on facemasks has always been quite variable… quite weak, quite difficult to know and there’s no real trials on it.”

Chris Whitty – 4 March – “In terms of wearing a mask, if you don’t have an infection really reduces the risks… almost not at all…”

28 April 2020 – Government Briefing – The recommendation from SAGE is completely clear – which is that there is weak evidence of a small effect in which a face mask can prevent a source of infection going from someone who is infected to the people around them.

Chris Whitty (Chief Medical Adviser to the UK Government) on 11/5/2020 – https://www.bitchute.com/video/9YYPBCcwGOUS/ “The great majority of the population won’t die from this. A proportion of the population won’t get the virus at all. Of those who get symptoms – 80% mild or moderate. Even the very highest risk groups – the great majority if they catch this virus will not die”.

I should not need to tell you that prolonged wearing of face coverings – especially basic/simple masks – is unhygienic, ineffective and can even endanger health. All the studies show they don’t provide protection for people. Healthy people don’t need to wear a mask and the government and media have, apparently, been putting out false information about “asymptomatic carriers” – instead of calling them “healthy people.” For these and other reasons, I refuse to visit my GP practice wearing a face covering and I refuse to wear them in shops or on public transport. The mandatory wearing of a mask assumes, for the wearer, one of two things (a) they wish to be protected from a virus (b) they are infected with it. In my case, (a) is not true and for most people (b) cannot be established without taking a (very unreliable or useless) test. I have never had any COVID symptoms myself . The comments of Cressida Dick about mask-wearing are also of considerable concern, as she is not a health worker. She is clearly an intelligent woman, so her remarks must serve another purpose than “protecting public health.”


Treatment of Victims

Although no one has isolated the alleged SARS-COV2 virus – the research done on it has yet to satisfy Koch’s postulates, for example, it is clear that people have been suffering from a respiratory illness. Most of those people fit into the pattern described by Chris Whitty on May 11 – they have other illnesses and/or are elderly. Quite early on, it became clear that victims of the respiratory illness could, in many cases, be successfully treated with an appropriate dosage of Hydroxychloroquine, just as Dr Simone Gold recently reported. Videos of the group that Dr Gold is part of have been censored. Not only that, but our very own Daily Mail seems to think that the unusual (non-medical) statements in sermons at a church given by a Doctor who is a passionate advocate of HCQ’s efficacy, affect the drugs usefulness in treating the COVID-19 illness! Similar sentiments were posted on the BBC’s website.


Dr Simone Gold compiled a white paper describing the groups of doctors that have found it to be effective.  So, almost anyone who does get sick with alleged COVID symptoms can be treated (bearing in mind the warning from Dr Wolfgang Wodarg, who found patients with G6PD deficiency could be badly affected if they were given HCQ).


Human Rights and Vaccinations

My concern, in 2009, regarding the alleged outbreak of Swine Flu was that some group wanted to enforce mandatory vaccinations – noises have recently been made by Matthew Hancock, and others, regarding this possibility. I must therefore remind you that (a) this is not even necessary – due to both the available treatment for the disease and also the evidence which shows it does not affect healthy people. Vaccine safety is, of course, a very very serious issue – even more applicable to the current “ideas” now surfacing due to irresponsible statements by the likes of Bill Gates on BBC TV on April 12 (and elsewhere). Mandatory vaccinations breach the human right of “informed consent” and are in contravention of the Nuremberg code.


Negligence and Scientific Fraud

I would therefore not have a clear conscience if I didn’t notify of the matters and evidence above. Now that several months have passed, enough evidence has accumulated to prove that massive scientific fraud has been committed. It seems to me that if you continue to allow government measures related to COVID-19 to be used in Derbyshire, you are complicit in this fraud. Of course, the implications of this fraud are enormous – and have almost certainly resulted in the unnecessary deaths of 10’s or 100’s of  people  in Derbyshire – and thousands and thousands more deaths around the world. I am trying to work out if there is a way to pass all this evidence to the police, to enable to bring action against those who have continued to commit fraud against in the county, the country – and the world. Currently, I have lodged some FOI requests related to the evidence I have mentioned above, although similar ones that have been lodged don’t seem to have been answered.



All of us involved in this whole affair have been deceived since late last year – and the UK and most other governments (Tanzania and Madagascar being notable exceptions) seem to be “taking orders” from “higher up.” 10’s or 100’s of people that I have communicated with now fully understand this.


I must therefore presume it’s the same story with Derbyshire Foundation Healthcare Trust – they have no real autonomy when it comes to this issue – I would love to be proved wrong. It seems the only “exit route” from the current scenario has already been determined – vaccination and immunity passports – which will ultimately be used to restrict or permit access to goods and services. This certainly seems to be what the WEF is promoting…. Of course, this is already happening with Air Travel. If this is actually true, then it won’t really matter what evidence is presented to refute the arguments made by these groups – the outcome has already been decided. Please think about that. Having studied the available evidence, you should come to know this is all because of a fear-based deception – and the UK Government and mainstream media have decided to act like a domestic terrorist group – engaging in a strategy of psychological warfare on the British Public. This is the only way I can now accurately describe the situation we are in.


I was correct in my assertions in 2009 and the evidence strongly supports my assertions now. I can state with confidence that all services should now return to normal – schools should be fully opened – with all lessons (including music with singing) taking place normally. Anyone that gets sick with COVID type symptoms (non-specific anyway) can be treated in the usual way and HCQ used as appropriate. Or do you wish for the madness to continue – and for doctors and healthcare workers to be censored and or sanctioned or punished for speaking out and telling the truth and talking about some of the evidence I’ve touched on here?


Yours Sincerely,


Andrew Johnson, BSc


Please share this information!