Compassion, “Collective Risk”, Pets, Humans 2.0 and MRNA Vaccines, Jackboots in Oz?

Reminder – Plandemic II – Indoctornation

I can highly recommend this new documentary – which has a lot of information packaged into 1¼ hours and it is also rather scary towards the end.

It can be downloaded free – and permission is given to re-upload. Also, there are more downloadable videos on their Bitchute channel:

Adrian’s Wise Words – “Show Compassion”

Another good 6-minute video from Anna Brees’ channel:

“COVID-19 – Collective Risk” – Morality Pill Needed?

For those that have been conned into the lie and who have invested in it heavily, we are now seeing more crazy thinking – I include a few quotes from this article (sent to me by Menna)

by Parker Crutchfield

Associate Professor of Medical Ethics, Humanities and Law, Western Michigan University

COVID-19 is a collective risk. It threatens everyone, and we all must cooperate to lower the chance that the coronavirus harms any one individual. Among other things, that means keeping safe social distances and wearing masks. But many people choose not to do these things, making spread of infection more likely.


My research in bioethics focuses on questions like how to induce those who are noncooperative to get on board with doing what’s best for the public good. To me, it seems the problem of coronavirus defectors could be solved by moral enhancement: like receiving a vaccine to beef up your immune system, people could take a substance to boost their cooperative, pro-social behavior. Could a psychoactive pill be the solution to the pandemic?

Moral enhancement is the use of substances to make you more moral. The psychoactive substances act on your ability to reason about what the right thing to do is, or your ability to be empathetic or altruistic or cooperative.

Sounds, again, like collectivism, communism or communitarianism to me…

Pets, Livestock and COVID-19

Also on the site above was this article: “Pets, livestock and wildlife can all catch coronavirus – does that make them dangerous?”

This seems to be another “let’s see how far we can push the boundaries” type piece, planting more fear, thus:

“Cats have been shown to be capable of passing the virus to one another, but it’s not yet known if they could be a viable reservoir for the virus. “


The Netherlands Centre for One Health is currently studying the potential role of cats in the spread of COVID. It’s working to establish the proportion of infected cats owned by human patients, to quantify direct and indirect transmission of the virus among cats, and to develop a mathematical model to examine the potential contribution of cats to sustained transmission of the virus among humans.

Extending this line of thought could, of course, lead to more bureaucracy for pet ownership – immunity passports and such nonsense for them to. Such are the “delights” of the use of the “germ theory” as opposed to the “terrain theory” of disease.

Humans 2.0 and MRNA Vaccines

Dr Madej discuss the ideas behind and use of Moderna’s (that might be “Mod(ify) RNA” – MRNA vaccine. It is said to use a substance called “Luciferase” which emits small amounts of light under the skin (and can therefore be detected with the correct equipment). (Why not call it “luminase”….?)

This is also discussed in a wider context in Patrick Wood’s video: and his article:

More Contradictions ….

Thanks to Dominick for these links…

Coronavirus pandemic could be over within two years – WHO head

Coronavirus will be with us forever, Sage scientist warns

COVID RNA Base Pairs are Identical to Chromosome 8 Human DNA

This video digresses a bit, but is interesting.

It is based around this posting, which argues that one of the “tags” the SARS-COV2 PCR test is picking up matches the sequence in Human “Chromosme 8”:

I have reproduced the posting, below, along with one of the comments, which seems important to consider.

WHO Coronavirus PCR Test Primer Sequence is Found in All Human DNA

WHO Primer

This was important enough that I wanted to get it out immediately. My research into the NCBI database for nucleotide sequences has led to a stunning discovery. One of the WHO primer sequences in the PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 is found in all human DNA!

The sequence “CTCCCTTTGTTGTGTTGT” is an 18-character primer sequence found in the WHO coronavirus PCR testing protocol document. The primer sequences are what get amplified by the PCR process in order to be detected and designated a “positive” test result. It just so happens this exact same 18-character sequence, verbatim, is also found on Homo sapiens chromosome 8! As far as I can tell, this means that the WHO test kits should find a positive result in all humans. Can anyone explain this otherwise?

I really cannot overstate the significance of this finding. At minimum, it should have a notable impact on test results.

WHO Primer 2

Homo sapiens chromosome 8, GRCh38.p12 Primary Assembly
Sequence ID: NC_000008.11 Length: 145138636
Range 1: 63648346 to 63648363 is “CTCCCTTTGTTGTGTTGT”

Update: After some effort, I have finally discovered a way to display proof (beyond my screenshots) that human chromosome 8 has this exact same 18-character sequence. Please try the link below. The sequence is shown at the bottom of the page.$=nuclalign&from=63648346&to=63648363

One of the comments reads thus:


April 11, 2020 at 5:23 am

People, the virus is an RNA virus, and chromosome 8 is DNA. It’s not going to be replicated by the RT-PCR, because this process starts with the Reverse Transcriptase (RT!), and therefore does not copy DNA.

The remaining question is whether this snipped can exist as RNA in human cells, which is still possible, but not necessarily likely. The overall test is positive if all three primers+probes are found, so one false positive primer does not kill the entire test.

Furthermore, you also need to have the probe in proximity to the primer. If the PCR doesn’t hit the probe, the test will stay negative. Is the probe found in chromosome 8?

The Chinese had some problems with their test in the first weeks, and changed things to improve the situation. This is normal in such a situation, where tests are developed in a hurry. The US CDC had severe quality issues in the beginning, even water tested positive.



Thank you for the comment. This is honestly what I was looking for…hoping to be wrong. Although I disagree that the process could not possibly be thrown off by this error. Any instances where chromosome 8 had been unzipped for replication would leave the matching sequence available for the PCR primer to anneal. This might not cause full replication by the PCR process, but if the test is so touchy you would really think this could throw off their results. If as you say plain water originally tested positive. Thanks again for the comment.

You would think they would have some technology to pick PCR primers that selects against sequences already found within human DNA. They also should have gone with a primer longer than 18 characters if they want reliable results. These tests are going to have a huge rate of false positives and/or negatives to the point where it’s questionable how much we can rely upon it. Let alone the idea that 80% of people who test positive show no outward symptoms. We need to end these draconian lockdowns immediately.

Jackboots in Oz?

As far as I can tell, this is authentic. It is therefore of great concern – as it indicates the rapid onset of a scenario that many of us feared would come about  earlier this year.


Please share this information!