Make sure you know how the MRNA vaccine works…
Some argue that it is not really a vaccine – it is “gene therapy” – and not tested in humans, in this form. They want to use it without proper testing. They want it to be administered, in some cases/settings, by people that aren’t necessarily doctors or nurses, or similar medical professionals…
RNA vaccines work by introducing into the body a messenger RNA (mRNA) sequence that contains the genetic instructions for the vaccinated person’s own cells to produce the vaccine antigens and generate an immune response.
Public Health England [UK’s ‘CDC’] admits using fake virus material to evaluate “COVID-19” tests, the gold standard is not isolated virus, and more..
Direct link to Public Health England’s admission:
Open Letter From: UK Medical Freedom Alliance to MHRA, JCVI etc
CONCERNS AND SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THE UK’S COVID-19 VACCINE AGENDA
We are an alliance of medical practitioners, scientists, academics and lawyers who are concerned about the current climate surrounding the impending use of a possible vaccine (“a Covid Vaccine”) that may be advertised, offered and administered among the general public in response to the recent pandemic that has been attributed to a virus called SARSCoV-2, which we are told causes the symptoms of a disease called COVID-19. In this letter we outline our concerns and highlight some of the potential negative outcomes that could arise if these concerns are not taken seriously. We also offer some suggestions for your consideration. These practical suggestions may help avert, or alleviate, some of the negative impacts that are likely to result if no action is taken and the current vaccine agenda continues unchecked. Our Concerns about a Covid Vaccine, at the present time (and subject to additions or amendments as the situation progresses) fall into the following four areas: I) Over-Estimation of the Public Health Risk from SARS-CoV-2 II) Inadequate Assessment of the Public Health Risk from a Covid Vaccine III) Medical Freedom and Informed Consent IV) Media Claims and Misinformation These are explained in detail below.
Dr. Simone Gold – Fraudulent papers re. HCQ
US Senate: There were fraudulent papers, published by individuals interested in doing evil to the world with respect to
James Corbett on Anyone Supporting Lockdowns…
Harsh words – but justifiable, I would say.
The Delingpod: The James Delingpole Podcast – Patrick Wood on The Great Reset etc
It can get a bit confusing keeping track of these groups… technocrats, Satanists, freemasons, Bilderbergers etc etc…
Lockdown: The Right Side Of History
A philosophical look at our current situation – comparing it to the times when slavery was thought to be acceptable and the “abolitionists” were castigated.
A Psychotic Professor?
Wow – pretty extreme – try to sell the vaccination to school children in a zoom call….
COVID19 – Evidence Of Global Fraud
Iain Davis, 17 Nov 2020
COVID 19, and the subsequent governmental responses, appear to be part of an international conspiracy to commit fraud. It seems there is no evidence that a virus called SARS-CoV-2 causes a disease called COVID 19.
Sometimes you have to go with your gut. I am not an expert in genetics and, as ever, stand to be corrected. However my attention was drawn to some research published by the Spanish medical journal D-Salud-Discovery. Their advisory board of eminently qualified physicians and scientists lends further credibility to their research. Their claim is astounding.
The genetic primers and probes used in RT-PCR tests to identify SARS-CoV-2 do not target anything specific. I followed the search techniques outlined in this English translation of their report and can corroborate the accuracy of their claims about the nucleotide sequences listed in the World Health Organisations protocols. You can do the same.
D-Salud-Discovery state there are no tests capable of identifying SARS-CoV-2. Consequently, all claims about the alleged impact of COVID 19 on population health are groundless.
The entire official COVID 19 narrative is a deception. Ostensibly, there is no scientific foundation for any part of it.
More on the “Portuguese PCR Test” Court Case
Unreliable, with a strong chance of false positives
The deliberation of the Lisbon Appeal Court is comprehensive and fascinating. It ruled that the Azores Regional Health Authority had violated both Portuguese and international law by confining the Germans to the hotel. The judges also said that only a doctor can “diagnose” someone with a disease, and were critical of the fact that they were apparently never assessed by one.
They were also scathing about the reliability of the PCR (polymerase chain reaction) test, the most commonly used check for Covid.
The conclusion of their 34-page ruling included the following: “In view of current scientific evidence, this test shows itself to be unable to determine beyond reasonable doubt that such positivity corresponds, in fact, to the infection of a person by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.”
In the eyes of this court, then, a positive test does not correspond to a Covid case. The two most important reasons for this, said the judges, are that, “the test’s reliability depends on the number of cycles used” and that “the test’s reliability depends on the viral load present.” In other words, there are simply too many unknowns surrounding PCR testing.
I was contacted by Suzana about this proposal. I suggested that airlines like Qantas are probably being bank rolled – because I think, otherwise, there is no way they would introduce such a measure. It must be that they are at the frontline of the “restrict everyone’s movements” agenda item.
I have just completed the Qantas customer care feedback form (link 1), regarding their proposed no-vaccine-no-fly mandate (link 3).
The text and all the relevant links are below (link 4).
You are welcome to share, use my text as template, send to any company that you do not agree with their draconian mandates.
They may back off when their pockets are hurting.
I am also including the link to the petition against Qantas, if you wish to put your name to it (link 2).
Links 4: My message to Qantas CEO with relevant links
Mr Alan Joyce
It appears that Qantas intends to enforce the Coronavirus vaccination on their passengers, as a requirement to board the flights. The passengers will therefore need to disclose their immunity status, under the proposed no-vaccine-no-fly mandate.
Could you please confirm that this is indeed true?
As a Qantas frequent flier, I do not wish to support non-medical corporate businesses that require the disclosure of personal health and immunity status of their customers. Such requirements are in breach of the Australian Privacy, Anti-Discrimination, and Consumer Laws. Besides that, I also refuse to support any businesses that impose such draconian requirements in support of companies that may participate in unsafe conduct and possible crimes against humanity. Please see the numerous links below.
I would like your prompt reply. If the rumors are true, I will be discouraging my family and friends, in Australia and overseas, from using Qantas services.
Look at “Recent Posts” on the website : https://www.checktheevidence.com/wordpress/category/news/
Follow on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Check-The-Evidence-772857093052741/
Follow on Twitter: https://twitter.com/check_evidence
Follow on Linked in: https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrew-johnson-a1487b19/
Or if you don’t use social media, you can use an RSS reader and use the link on the http://www.checktheevidence.com/wordpress site for RSS