Dialogue with UK MP Pauline Latham – “No Evidence of SARS COV2 Isolation”
I thought I would re-post the letter I just sent to my MP, who was slightly sarcastic to me in her last response. Feel free to use it yourself….
From: Andrew Johnson <ad.johnson@ntlworld.com>
Sent: 21 December 2020 18:20
To: ‘LATHAM, Pauline’ <LATHAMP@parliament.uk>
Subject: RE: “No Evidence of SARS COV2 Isolation” – my response.
Dear Ms Latham
Apologies regarding my error about how you most recently voted. However, you HAVE voted for restrictions in the past – https://votes.parliament.uk/Votes/Commons/Division/902and. Hence, you have negatively contributed to the “state of affairs” we are in now. As you may be aware, I have written to you several times about what is really going on – but you’ve ignored the evidence I’ve sent. Evidence now attached proves that Matt Hancock lied to Parliament and also shows that, soon after, he stated the Coronavirus Bill had been “worked on” for 3 months, prior to 23rd March. This is in the Hansard record.
You wrote
I am once again in awe of your ability to find some incredibly niche ‘news’ sources, such as Russia Today and a website campaigning against fluoridated water in a Canadian municipality,
This seems somewhat sarcastic – and I would guess you are mistaking the URL of the site for the links that are on it. (I was referring to this: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/university-of-toronto-sunnybrook-hsc-have-no-record-of-covid-19-virus-isolation/)
In my attached “Fraud” report, in section 2.1 (available online here), you will find the response I had from Public Health England, when I asked them for evidence of virus isolation. So, they had no evidence themselves. Neither do Public Health Scotland, nor Wales. It was Ms Massey’s site that collated this information. The page I sent you showed the “Canadian Researchers virus Isolation story” does not stand up to scrutiny their team did NOT isolate the virus either! This explained on the page. And even if it was true, why can’t the UK independently do its own isolation, when it is, according to people like you, the most important issue in our time?
So here we are – having “masked people up” for months, told them to stay at home etc etc – we all know the story… But nothing is working is it? “Christmas has been cancelled” (as was Easter). Yet in Liverpool, 154 people out of 23,000 “tested positive” for COVID – does that sound like a pandemic to you? Does it? You must now be aware that the inventor (or co-inventor) of the PCR test technique said it cannot be used for medical diagnosis – and some of the testing kits even state “For Research Use Only” (would you like me to send you one such document?)
And let’s talk about the real problem, supposedly, COVID deaths – well, according to ONS figures deaths in October 2020 were about the same as 2019. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/monthlyfiguresondeathsregisteredbyareaofusualresidence
So, where is this “pandemic” now?
I knew this was a scam from the “get go.” Below I reproduce a short section from the first report I produced (“Challenging the Narrative”) back in April. Beneath that you will find a link to a Mar 2010 Channel 4 news report also (essentially) show the 2009 Swine Flu Pandemic was illusory. So, how did I correctly call out the scam, months before most other people?
People say to me “Andrew you’re not a medical doctor or health professional.” This is true. However, the same criticism is never publicly levelled at Bill Gates (who has no college/University degree – let alone a medical qualification). Gates, you should be aware, was given 17 minutes on a 12 April BBC broadcast to talk about COVID and (paraphrasing) his plan to “vaccinate the whole world.”
You go on to state claims about the vaccine being dangerous are “nonsense.” Unfortunately, in haste, I missed off the relevant link in my last message.
Here. I have also attached a leaflet sent to me by an anonymous health professional, the text of which is posted in the 7th item here).
I guess you haven’t seen some of the information coming from the CDC. See page 6.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2020-12/slides-12-19/05-COVID-CLARK.pdf
You claim the MHRA (partly funded by the BMGF) trials were “rigorous.” Does that mean they were able to compress what is normally done over a period of about 7 years into 7 months do you think? I don’t think that is humanly possible – and the evidence already emerging suggests that this is the correct conclusion and the one your wrote about is not correct.
Were you aware of what happened, for example, Pandemrix Swine Flu Vaccine record, by any chance? If not, make yourself aware. Surely it is worth asking why the Government (i.e. UK Taxpayer) should pay for vaccine damage and not the massively wealthy pharmaceutical companies that manufacture them?
And then there’s the Kamran Abbasi’s recent editorial in the BMJ itself – did you read it?
Robert Dean of Sky News Australia recently discussed how a Tasmanian MP had no understanding of what is being planned by wealthy business leaders – on the back of the COVID-19 scam. Are you informed? Have you just decided to go along with it? Here’s Mr Dean’s report from a few weeks ago. It is deeply concerning that this is being entertained as what will happen – by democratically elected governments in a number of countries.
https://www.skynews.com.au/details/_6209870815001
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pF_kXE-HXSQ
I now leave you with some information from the WHO – you know, that body that appears to be telling most of the world governments “what to do.” Below those links, are others you should consider in establishing the truth about what is actually going on here. It has little or nothing to do with preserving public health – and about 2000 people who co-signed my “Fraud” report agree with me (see attached list of most signatories – more have “signed up” since I generated this list). Public Health Officials have received copies of my “fraud” report, along with the SFO and various Police Chief Constables. No one has offered me any corrections or challenges.
As far as I am concerned, as I have already said, those acting as if the COVID-19 pandemic is “real” are accessories to massive fraud – proved by evidence that is attached – and more. And whether I am correct or not, our democracy has been shredded in the last 9 excruciating months. Democracy shows no signs of being recovered – from what I’ve been reading and hearing, use of the vaccine won’t affect any of the “regulations” – such as unlawful mask mandates. i.e. even you get vaccinated, it won’t exempt you from mask-wearing. Huh? So what exactly is the “exit plan?” (Sorry, that’s a rhetorical question…)
I suggested that any ministers that have supported any restrictions have collectively allowed this “shredding” of democracy to happen. All measures should be reversed now – and should have never been put in place.
Yours Sincerely,
Andrew Johnson
22 Mear Drive
Borrowash
Derbyshire
DE72 3QW
P.S. How are my “research skills” now? (I’ve been sent information and documents by many, many people from around the world.)
WHO Says Don’t Wear Masks When Exercising
“People should NOT wear masks when exercising as masks may reduce the ability to breathe comfortably.”
WHO Says Asymptomatic Carriers Aren’t Infectious
CRUCIAL QUOTE
“Comprehensive studies on transmission from asymptomatic individuals are difficult to conduct, but the available evidence from contact tracing reported by Member States suggests that asymptomatically-infected individuals are much less likely to transmit the virus than those who develop symptoms,” Van Kerkhove later tweeted.
WHO says Lockdowns should not be used.
https://twitter.com/spectator/status/1314573157827858434
WHO says Contact Tracing Should Not Be Used
https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/329438/9789241516839-eng.pdf#page=9
WHO – “Be Careful with PCR Testing.”
https://www.who.int/news/item/14-12-2020-who-information-notice-for-ivd-users
Disease is not infectious for long (Wuhan Study)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w
Danish Study (2020) Masks Don’t Work in Protecting against spread of COVID
https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-6817
<![if !supportLists]>1.1 <![endif]>The 2009 Swine Flu “Pandemic”
In early 2009, it was alleged the UK was – or would be – in the grip of a Swine Flu Pandemic. At the time, I was not convinced of the claims being made and carried out a similar process of research and investigation to the one included in this report. I wrote to the UK Department of Health in August 2009 and they couldn’t satisfactorily answer a number of the questions I asked them[i]. Of course, there was no obvious “mass death outbreak” during that pandemic either, as the figures on the ONS site clearly show[ii]. (Negative figures show when 2009 deaths were fewer than in 2008 or 2010.)
|
ENGLAND & WALES |
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
Jun |
Jul |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
Total |
|
2008 |
51,951 |
42,257 |
41,928 |
45,929 |
39,134 |
37,741 |
39,961 |
34,878 |
39,095 |
42,061 |
39,406 |
53,488 |
507,829 |
|
2009 |
54,938 |
41,348 |
42,302 |
40,209 |
36,500 |
38,755 |
37,877 |
33,516 |
39,013 |
40,090 |
40,030 |
45,669 |
490,247 |
|
2010 |
48,269 |
40,984 |
45,071 |
40,507 |
36,439 |
40,080 |
36,799 |
35,979 |
39,317 |
38,540 |
42,038 |
48,191 |
492,214 |
|
‘09 – ‘08 |
2,987 |
-909 |
374 |
-5,720 |
-2,634 |
1,014 |
-2,084 |
-1,362 |
-82 |
-1,971 |
624 |
-7,819 |
-17,582 |
|
‘09 – ‘10 |
6,669 |
364 |
-2,769 |
-298 |
61 |
-1,325 |
1,078 |
-2,463 |
-304 |
1,550 |
-2,008 |
-2,522 |
-1,967 |
Neither the yearly nor monthly figure comparisons shown above seem consistent with claims of a Swine Flu pandemic having been in progress during 2009 as fewer people actually died in 2009 than in 2008 and 2010! Indeed, according to an article in the Daily Telegraph from 01 July 2010, “Swine flu killed 457 people and cost £1.24 billion, official figures show.”
Channel 4 News Exposes Swine Flu Scandal in Early March 2010
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9qeLcq3y8w
<![if !supportLists]>1.2 <![endif]>PHE and Virus Isolation
Isolation of the dangerous/infectious agent is the central pillar on which the consensus “COVID-19” narrative is based. However, there are very good reasons to question whether this virus has ever been accurately identified. On 24 July 2020, I submitted a Freedom of Information Request (FOIR) to Public Health England (PHE), thus[iii].
Dear Public Health England,
I would like to see:
All records in the possession, custody or control of Public Health England describing the isolation of a SARS-COV-2 virus, directly from a sample taken from a diseased patient, where the patient sample was not first combined with any other source of genetic material (i.e. monkey kidney cells aka vero cells; liver cancer cells).
Please note that I am using “isolation” in the every-day sense of the word: the act of separating a thing(s) from everything else. I am not requesting records where “isolation of SARS-COV-2” refers *instead* to:
• the culturing of something, or
• the performance of an amplification test (i.e. a PCR test), or
• the sequencing of something.
Please also note that my request is not limited to records that were authored by the PHE or that pertain to work done by the PHE. My request includes any sort of record, for example (but not limited to) any published peer-reviewed study that the PHE has downloaded or printed.
Please provide enough information about each record so that I may identify and access each record with certainty (i.e. title, author(s), date, journal, where the public may access it).”
Yours faithfully,
Andrew Johnson
PHE responded on 20 August 2020:
Thank you for your email dated 24 July 2020. In accordance with Section 1(1)(a) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the Act), I can confirm that Public Health England (PHE) does not hold the information you have specified.
Response:
PHE can confirm it does not hold information in the way suggested by your request.
Under section 16 of the Act, public authorities have a duty to provide advice and
assistance. I have signposted you to the below links which contain information on
taking COVID-19 swabs.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-guidance-for-taking-swab-samples
Additionally, the below publication contains some information on virus isolation:
https://www.eurosurveillance.org/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.32.2001483
If you have any queries regarding the information that has been supplied to you,
please refer your query to in writing in the first instance. If you remain dissatisfied
and would like to request an internal review, then please contact us at the address
above or by emailing xxx@xxx.xxx.xx.
Considering the consequences to this country’s people, economy and way of life, it is absolutely incredible to learn that Public Health England has no documented independent evidence of its own that this virus has been properly isolated and properly identified.
From: LATHAM, Pauline <LATHAMP@parliament.uk>
Sent: 15 December 2020 09:56
To: ad.johnson@ntlworld.com
Subject: FW: Letter from your constituent Andrew Johnson
Dear Mr Johnson,
Thank you for emailing me about coronavirus restrictions.
I am once again in awe of your ability to find some incredibly niche ‘news’ sources, such as Russia Today and a website campaigning against fluoridated water in a Canadian municipality, and somehow miss such a public matter as my vote against coronavirus restrictions.
The sources you cite do, in fact, substantiate the fact that coronavirus was isolated, in the scientific sense of the word, in Canadian laboratories. The freedom of information request, I quote, defined isolation as ‘the act of separating a thing(s) from everything else’ and then continued to say ‘I am not requesting records where ‘isolation of SARS COV-2 refers instead only to: the culturing of something, the performance of an amplification test (i.e. a PCR test), and/or the sequencing of something’. Unsurprisingly, since this betrays a complete misunderstanding of what isolation means in the context of epidemiology, the responses stated that no such records existed. Sinai Health’s response is the most instructive: ‘We are not clear on the records that you are requesting, as we are not aware that isolation of a virus in the manner that you have described is possible for any virus’. In other words, the freedom of information request made no sense. This is hardly proof that coronavirus does not exist.
The data incontrovertibly shows over 70,000 deaths this year, when compared with the average of the last five years. Of course the people who tested positive were followed, and I am amazed that you think differently. When people die, a death certificate is produced showing the causes. Coronavirus has appeared on nearly 65,000 death certificates this year so far. This is a matter of public record, which you can find extremely easily. Your lack of basic research, while writing to me repeatedly with your conspiracy theories, is, frankly, offensive.
Your claim that the coronavirus vaccines being trialled are dangerous is nonsense. I can assure you that the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has followed rigorous procedures to ensure the vaccine meets the high standards needed to be considered both safe and effective. The MHRA is one of the most respected regulators in the world and I welcome that the World Health Organisation has commended the work of the MHRA and backed this approach. Any coronavirus vaccine that is approved must go through rigorous clinical trials and safety checks. I am proud that the UK has some of the highest safety standards in the world. So far, thousands of people have been given a coronavirus vaccine and no serious side effects or complications have been reported.
I will repeat what I said in my previous email: ‘There are plenty of valid questions that my constituents are posing regarding coronavirus, and I would ask that you carefully consider whether you have any genuine concerns to bring to my attention before sending me another email on this topic.’
I voted against the restrictions because I consider them to be disproportionate to the threat presented by coronavirus. That does not mean I deny the existence of the threat. Your comments hinder my arguments and those of my like-minded Conservative colleagues by associating the anti-restriction position with dangerous conspiracy theories and I would encourage you to find some reputable news sources with which to educate yourself.
Your concerns are not genuine and your questions are in bad faith. I will not respond to any further correspondence with you on this matter.
Yours sincerely,
Pauline Latham OBE MP
Member of Parliament for Mid-Derbyshire
Parliamentary Office: Constituency Office:
House of Commons The Old Station, Station Road
Westminster Spondon
London Derbyshire
SW1A 0AA DE21 7NE
( 0207 219 7110 ( 01332 676 679
I like to keep residents informed about how she has been working for the constituency across both Mid Derbyshire and Westminster through a monthly e-newsletter. If you would like to receive the newsletter please click here
Please check out my website @ www.paulinelatham.co.uk
Follow me on Twitter: @pauline_latham (www.twitter.com/pauline_latham)
In line with data protection regulations, this office processes constituents’ data for casework and policy query purposes under the lawful basis of public task. In instances where this lawful basis is not sufficient and explicit consent is required, a member of the office will get in touch with you to establish your consent.
Please note that this office uses data from the open electoral register for referencing and filing purposes.
As a data subject, you have the right to request access to all personal data that we hold on you by making a Subject Access Request to this office. If the data we hold on you is no longer necessary for the casework or policy query purposes for which it was collected, you have the right to erasure of that data. You also have the right of rectification if the data that we hold on you is no longer correct. This office will not use your personal data in a way that goes beyond your reasonable expectations in contacting us. The Data Protection Policy can be found Click here and the Privacy Notice can be found Click here
From: Andrew Johnson <fyr-mirvefa55d_tbn3r7f6lfolbkkwves@writetothem.com>
Sent: 05 December 2020 15:10
To: LATHAM, Pauline <LATHAMP@parliament.uk>
Subject: Letter from your constituent Andrew Johnson
Andrew Johnson
22 Mear Drive
Borrowash
Derbyshire
DE72 3QW
Phone: 01332544947
Email: ad.johnson@ntlworld.com
Saturday 5 December 2020
Dear Pauline Latham,
Just to make sure that you will NOT be voting for any legislation which
moves us further towards medical tyranny – either by supporting
restrictions for those who refuse or cannot take any (untested,
unaccountable) vaccine – or any legislation which is proposed which
would in any way contravene the Nuremberg code. Dr Mike Yeadon and Dr
Wolfgang Wodarg are calling for an end to all vaccine trials – due to
the danger they pose and the effects they’ve had on some of the hapless
volunteers.
https://www.rt.com/op-ed/507937-covid-pcr-test-fail/
Unfortunately, the “lunatics have taken over the asylum” and seemingly
can’t even examine their own data – which shows there is no COVID
pandemic and therefore no measures of any kind should be in place. Case
in point Liverpool – 0.7% tested positive.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-merseyside-54885261
Did anyone follow up on these people to see if they were ill, admitted
to hospital or died? Thought not… A visit to any local cemetery or a
review of Oct 2019/Oct 2020 death figures will confirm there is no
pandemic. But “Oh, no” – you couldn’t possibly accept that you, like
so many, have been conned by a fear agenda, thrust upon us by Boris
Johnson, the liar Matt Hancock and SAGE and all the rest, could you?
The PCR test does not work and has recently been discredited by a new
report:
https://cormandrostenreview.com/report/
Oh and a court in Portugal as has also ruled in favour of imprisoned
holiday makers who pointed out the PCR test proves nothing.
https://www.rt.com/op-ed/507937-covid-pcr-test-fail/
You should now study and then accept as valid this information – and
use it to vote for a restoration of ALL our freedoms). Oh and by the
way, in your last communication to me, you claimed this alleged
SARS-COV2 virus had been isolated in Canada. Your information, like
most coming from politicians, was faulty/bogus – a request to the
University where this isolation took place yielded no records of this
isolation. Here’s a link for you:
Do the decent thing and don’t support medical tyranny and the
progressive destruction of our way of life – which is what you have
voted for in the past, it seems. To quote Lord Jonathan Sumption:
“All these things that we’ve been told to give up – affection,
friendship from less than 6 feet away and indeed large gatherings,
family celebrations and companionships… All these things are not, as
Lord Sumption says, ‘optional extras’… these things are LIFE ITSELF….”
I hope that everyone, including yourself, who continues to support
ongoing fraud and related crimes, is served justice at some point in
the future.
Yours sincerely,
Andrew Johnson
64a71689676fa7700123/9574233d480831f74068
(Signed with an electronic signature in accordance with section 7(3) of
the Electronic Communications Act 2000.)
[ This message was sent by WriteToThem.com. If you have had any
problems receiving this message, please email support@writetothem.com
and we’ll get back to you. See www.writetothem.com for more details
about the service. We have sent this email to
pauline.latham.mp@parliament.uk; if this address is out of date please
email us so that we can update our records. ]
UK Parliament Disclaimer: this e-mail is confidential to the intended recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses, but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail. This e-mail address is not secure, is not encrypted and should not be used for sensitive data.
[i] http://checktheevidencecom.ipage.com/checktheevidence.com/pdf/Swine Flu – DH and Derbs PCT response-2020 with Original Response Attached-28-09-2009.pdf
[ii] https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/monthlyfiguresondeathsregisteredbyareaofusualresidence
[iii] https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/documents_held_showing_sars_cov2