Elton John and Michael Caine in NHS/Imperial College Propaganda
Can you make it through the 1:30 seconds…
Nature: Antibody-dependent enhancement and SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and therapies (09 Sep 2020)
ADE has been observed in SARS, MERS and other human respiratory virus infections including RSV and measles, which suggests a real risk of ADE for SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and antibody-based interventions. However, clinical data has not yet fully established a role for ADE in human COVID-19 pathology. Steps to reduce the risks of ADE from immunotherapies include the induction or delivery of high doses of potent neutralizing antibodies, rather than lower concentrations of non-neutralizing antibodies that would be more likely to cause ADE.
Going forwards, it will be crucial to evaluate animal and clinical datasets for signs of ADE, and to balance ADE-related safety risks against intervention efficacy if clinical ADE is observed. Ongoing animal and human clinical studies will provide important insights into the mechanisms of ADE in COVID-19. Such evidence is sorely needed to ensure product safety in the large-scale medical interventions that are likely required to reduce the global burden of COVID-19.
UK Column News Special: Care Home Whistleblower
This person explains the terrible situations in care homes – and how people are prevented from acting – because they have, essentially, become “Agents of the State” and as such aren’t allowed to act independently, if they want to keep their jobs. This has, undoubtedly caused misery and death (although the whistleblower doesn’t overtly state that). Also mentioned are the contradictory and unreliable test results (as if we didn’t already know about those.)
Once again, though, the underlying narrative of the pandemic isn’t really called into question much.
UK Govt – Name: COVID-19 mRNA Pfizer- BioNTech vaccine analysis print
Report Run Date: 31-Jan-2021
Data Lock Date: 28-Jan-2021 19:00:04
On Page 49: “TOTAL REACTIONS FOR DRUG 49472 Fatal: 107“
LONG-TERM MASK USE MAY CONTRIBUTE TO ADVANCED STAGE LUNG CANCER, STUDY FINDS
DR. SHERRI TENPENNY EXPLAINS HOW THE DEPOPULATION COVID VACCINES WILL START WORKING IN 3-6 MONTHS
UK Govt: Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation Blog (June 2020)
This seems to be one of these “reasonable” documents, but it doesn’t question, of course, the true nature of the pandemic – that it isn’t real…
Make no mistake – the only paragraph in this document should be “There is no pandemic – and the 2020 overall death figures show this” (see Richard D Hall below and earlier postings on this website) “therefore, no passports or vaccinations of any kind are needed.” That would also have saved a lot of government money….
Covid-19: Social murder, they wrote—elected, unaccountable, and unrepentant – BMJ Letter by Dr Janet Menage
History is littered with examples of the atrocities which ensue when doctors abandon their traditional principles and judgement in favour of unquestioning subservience to government diktat – medical involvement in torture, human experimentation and psychiatric punishment of political dissidents being familiar examples.
Retracted HCQ Paper – The Lancet is Also “in on” The Fraud
This the paper where they claimed HCQ either doesn’t work in treating COVID symptoms, or, indeed it is dangerous. Nonsense. It’s been in use for decades.
Richard D Hall – Covid scam, monetary system, great reset & ‘smart’ money. Bitcoin & crypto currencies.
A couple of hours of Richard on elements of the scam and what is planned.
The DAVOS WEF meeting has been postponed again. https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/wefs-davos-2021-summit-in-singapore-postponed-until-august-2362635
Maskless shoppers react to J & W Foods – Toronto
Paulo in Portugal Writes…
Some of Paulo’s preliminary COVID-related research is included below. He, like several others, has found that SARS-COV2 was not new… He says: “t bear in mind that this is information which is still being analyzed. So when you post it on your websites, I hope you make it clear that it’s still preliminary data. If I come to a sensible conclusion as to what that information might mean, I’ll be glad to let you know.”
A month ago, I gave Richard Hall an advice on how to approach this COVID situation and I used the prime example of Dr. Judy Wood and how she approached the 9/11 research, and you, of all people, should know how her investigation was carried out. After all, you helped and supported her in that research.
She approached it not by pointing fingers or relying on somebody else’s research, but by doing her own investigation, while making no assumptions and letting the evidence guide her, rather the other way around.
That’s how one should approach this COVID-19 subject. So far, to my knowledge, no one has done so.
So that’s what this message is going to be about – showing you the evidence (or at least information which could be vital), in order to make sense of what really happened.
“What happened?” is the first question that should be asked. Always remember: you cannot determine “who did it” or “why he/she/they did it” (if there is a guilty person or group) if you haven’t figured out what happened.
Many people started blaming Bill Gates (and now Klaus Schwab), before they determined what happened. Now, I’m not casting aspersions on you, as I know how tempting it can be to fall for these tricks. I fell for them very early on, and then I realized I needed to start thinking for myself.
So, what happened?
The only way to figure out what happened is to investigate the first report of an alleged outbreak in Wuhan, China.
Who were the first people to report the alleged outbreak?
Here are some of the names of the people involved.
The first person that I looked at was a Wuhan respiratory doctor called Zhang Jixian. Here are some links to the story that the mainstream media gives about how she allegedly discovered this supposedly new virus:
Another one is an ophthalmologist called Lin Wenliang and this individual was heavily featured in the mainstream media, including CNN, BBC and other major news outlets. According to the official narrative, this doctor started spreading the word on an online chat group that a SARS outbreak had occurred, which prompted the police to warn him that he was spreading rumours and could potentially face criminal charges for doing so. The story goes that he contracted the COVID-19 disease and then died weeks later. I have a suspicion that this story is a fabrication, and I base that on the fact that he seemed to be a healthy 33-year old person with no preexisting conditions. Links to this story:
And there’s also a doctor called Ai Fen who reportedly was the first person to deal with a COVID patient on 18 December 2019:
I’ve not been able to extract more information and determine the validity of these stories, however, if you want to understand what happened, this a good place to start.
Now, I want to share with you something that is very interesting. Right now, with regards to the nature of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, this where the evidence seems to point to:
<![if !supportLists]>· <![endif]>SARS-CoV-2 is a coronavirus strain which has been isolated in many countries, including Portugal (see here: https://expresso.pt/sociedade/2020-04-24-Covid-19.-As-primeiras-imagens-reais-do-SARS-COV-2-em-Portugal);
<![if !supportLists]>· <![endif]>SARS-CoV-2 spreads from person to person;
<![if !supportLists]>· <![endif]>The standard test that is used to detect the presence of the virus, the RT-PCR test, seems to be extremely reliable when looking for traces of this particular virus strain, however, it cannot determine whether the virus is infectious, active or very virulent, or whether it’s the cause of the symptoms that the person is experiencing or the cause of the deaths attributed to the alleged COVID-19 disease;
<![if !supportLists]>· <![endif]>The dissemination of SARS-CoV-2 among the population is NOT a public health emergency;
<![if !supportLists]>· <![endif]>SARS-CoV-2 was spreading across the globe long before the alleged outbreak in Wuhan, an indication which contradicts the phylogenetic studies that allegedly demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 jumped from animal to humans in late 2019;
Evidence which indicates SARS-CoV-2 was circulating worldwide as early as August 2019, 4 months before the alleged Wuhan outbreak:
<![if !supportLists]>· <![endif]>Various samples collected before the “alarm was sounded”, showing either the presence of the virus itself or people with antibodies against it;
<![if !supportLists]>· <![endif]>The “explosion” of positive COVID cases very early on, indicating the virus was already in circulation and was not new;
<![if !supportLists]>· <![endif]>A great portion of asymptomatic COVID-positive people, which could be explained by preexisting immunity against SARS-CoV-2;
The following paper notes: “The COVID-19 infection was present in China, and even in Europe, at the end of 2019, i.e., well before its explosion in Wuhan in January of this year.”
If SARS-CoV-2 was spreading across the globe long before the Chinese alerted to its presence, then any lockdown measure/restrictions were (and still are) completely useless and one must pose the question: why didn’t the other countries detect the virus, if it was really something to worry about? Why was China the only country to notice it?
This research paper by Italian scientists was featured on the CDC website:
It provides evidence of the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in a patient in early December 2019 in Italy, who at the time was suspected of having measles. The presence of the virus in his system indicates that it was circulating worldwide as early as mid-November 2019, 1 month and a half before the “alarm was sounded”. The question remains the same – if this supposedly deadly virus was really circulating among humans worldwide before the alleged outbreak in China, then why didn’t other countries notice it?
Again, the data needs to be looked at in order to reach a conclusion as to what exactly is SARS-CoV-2 and what exactly is going on, since we know that there is no evidence that its circulation among humans poses a threat to the health of the general public (or at the least the healthy ones).
It’s very important to say that we should take all of this information with a very fine grain of salt. This is data that I’m still looking at and studying, and until a full analysis has been carried out, one should not jump to conclusions. Also note that some of these studies need to be looked at carefully, as there might be other factors that could explain the apparent presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in late 2019.
Look at “Recent Posts” on the website : https://www.checktheevidence.com/wordpress/category/news/
Follow on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Check-The-Evidence-772857093052741/
Follow on Twitter: https://twitter.com/check_evidence
Follow on Linked in: https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrew-johnson-a1487b19/
Or if you don’t use social media, you can use an RSS reader and use the link on the http://www.checktheevidence.com/wordpress site for RSS